A Tragic Hero: The King of Israel (2 Kings 6:24-31)
Tragic heroes always begin high up. Tragedy cannot befall the man who is already down; tragedy happens when a man is knocked down. Tragedy, therefore, happens to kings, to the rich, and to the happy. So, it’s tragic that two happy lovers are star-crossed (Romeo and Juliet); it’s tragic that King Lear goes mad, and alienates everyone around him; it’s tragic that a great man (David) would fall from holiness into adultery and murder. Tragedy involves a fall from a higher place, to a lower: from prosperity to poverty: from righteousness to sin. This is why Chaucer said, "Tragedy is to say a dite (literary composition) of a prosperity for a time that endeth in wretchedness."
Thus, it is of special import that the King of Israel begins our narrative, “on a wall.” The fact that he is, “passing by on a wall” is mentioned twice (6.26, 30). Hebrew narrative is sparse in these kinds of details. So, why the double mention that the King is on a wall? First, this sets him up for the fall. Being, “on a wall,” at the beginning of a story is a bad sign of things to come, “Humpty-Dumpy sat on a wall…”
The picture of him standing up on the wall, emphasized by the narrator, sets him up above our vision. We are looking up to him when the narrative begins; we are looking down at him when it ends. The other bad thing about being “on a wall” is exposure. It leaves one in full view. So, when the king dons his sackcloth, he does so in full view of his people (v. 30). This is a public spectacle. His humiliation is deepened because it is so public. He has his fall right in front of everyone, “now he was passing by on the wall—and the people looked, and behold, he had sackcloth beneath on his body (v. 30).”
Now, lest we think that it is cruel to see a king knocked down, we should remember that his fall is evidence of his dignity: proof, in reverse, of his dignity: