Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Comic Heroes (2 Kings 6:24-7.20)

Comic Heroes: The Lepers of 2 Kings 6:24-7:20
by CWK

            This passage contains comic heroes, and like all comic heroes, they are unlikely. They are a group of lepers, barely clinging to life when we meet them.
            In a sermon on 2 Kings 6, Spurgeon paints the picture of their lives:

These poor diseased beings were compelled to live in shanties outside the city gate, and to keep themselves apart from all others. Fed from day to day with food passed over the wall, so long as there was any to pass over, they rotted away in horrible loathsomeness. They were not allowed inside the city walls: their wretched hospital was without the gate.

            And these are our heroes? We might ask what they are even doing in the narrative. Aren’t there great characters (the King, Elisha, soldiers, etc) that deserve more narrative attention? Yet, these are the lowly, and only the lowly are primed for exaltation, “Those who humble themselves will be exalted.”
            Criswell reflects a fairly common response to God’s choice of heroes, “I thought when I picked up the Bible, and looked at the title of these volumes, that when it spoke of Kings, that I would read of the great and the mighty, the magnificent and the illustrious.”
            Yes, these are our heroes. They do the one thing comic heroes always do, and the one thing the king of Israel is notable for not doing. They act. As they reason on the edge of starvation and death, they conclude, “The worst they can do is kill us.” Then, they move from reason to action. Their action pays off, and they are the first to discover that the active word of God, present in Elisha is true truth (2 Kings 7.8).
            We may be surprised that these characters gain heroic status. If we are familiar with the genre of comedy, we won’t be. Comedy is usually about average man – actually, the less than average man. The loser. The nobody. The geek. The nerd. There is a comedic type across films: Awkward Teenager (American Pie); Nerd (Revenge of the Nerds); Poor Kids (Meatballs).  Each of these characters has one thing in common:  they are common.
            So, why is it that the comic hero is always the average – or less than average – character?
Because you must be low to rise. A character that is already high up (like the king of Israel) only has one place to go: down. In tragedy, Jesus’ words are proved true: “Those who exalt themselves will be humbled.” In comedy, they are also proved true,  “Those who humble themselves will be exalted.”

A Tragic Hero: The King of Israel (2 Kings 6:24-31)

A Tragic Hero: the King of Israel
by CWK

          Tragic heroes always begin high up. Tragedy cannot befall the man who is already down; tragedy happens when a man is knocked down. Tragedy, therefore, happens to kings, to the rich, and to the happy. So, it’s tragic that two happy lovers are star-crossed (Romeo and Juliet); it’s tragic that King Lear goes mad, and alienates everyone around him; it’s tragic that a great man (David) would fall from holiness into adultery and murder. Tragedy involves a fall from a higher place, to a lower: from prosperity to poverty: from righteousness to sin. This is why Chaucer said, "Tragedy is to say a dite (literary composition) of a prosperity for a time that endeth in wretchedness."
            Thus, it is of special import that the king of Israel begins our narrative, “on a wall.” The fact that he is, “passing by on a wall” is mentioned twice (6.26, 30). Hebrew narrative is sparse in these kinds of details. So, why the double mention that the king is on a wall? First, this sets him up for the fall. Being, “on a wall,” at the beginning of a story is a bad sign of things to come, “Humpty-Dumpy sat on a wall…”
            The picture of him standing up on the wall, belabored by the narrator, sets him up above our vision. We are looking up to him when the narrative begins; we are looking down at him when it ends. The other bad thing about being “on a wall” is exposure.  It leaves one in full view. So, when the king dons his sackcloth, he does so in full view of his people (v. 30). This is a public spectacle. His humiliation is deepened because it is so public. He has his fall right in front of everyone, “now he was passing by on the wall—and the people looked, and behold, he had sackcloth beneath on his body (v. 30).” The people’s response to this is mentioned. “Behold” is even added to heighten the surprise of this scene. It is a ridiculous image, and it evokes a smile in the same way a proud man slipping on a banana might.
            Now, lest we think that it is cruel to see a king knocked down, we should remember that his fall is evidence of his dignity: proof, in reverse, of his dignity:

Unless a thing is dignified, it cannot be undignified. Why is it funny that a man should sit down suddenly in the street? There is only one possible or intelligent reason: that man is the image of God. It is not funny that anything else should fall down; only that a man should fall down. No one sees anything funny in a tree falling down. No one sees a delicate absurdity in a stone falling down. No man stops in the road and roars with laughter at the sight of the snow coming down. The fall of thunderbolts is treated with some gravity. The fall of roofs and high buildings is taken seriously. It is only when a man tumbles down that we laugh. Why do we laugh? Because it is a grave religious matter: it is the Fall of Man. Only man can be absurd: for only man can be dignified.[1]


[1] From Spiritualism by G.K. Chesteron, in ebook format: http://www.readbookonline.net/readOnLine/20607/

Theories of Humor (Chart)

created by CWK
                       
Theory
Definition
Theorist
Example
Value
Critique
Superiority
-“sudden glory (Hobbes)” when we see our superiority over others
-society’s defense against eccentrics who don’t fit in (Bergson)
-Plato
-Aristotle
-Thomas Hobbes
-F.H. Buckley
-Alexander Bain
-Henri Bergson
“Put down” jokes; Comedy Central Roasts

Doesn’t account for puns; excludes “love” as a motive; superiority is not a necessary condition of humor (we are superior to dogs,cats, etc) (Francis Hutcheson)
Inferiority
-humility/modesty; not taking self too seriously
-Robert Solomon
Three Stooges

 Can devolve into low view of self.
Cruelty
-superiority theory mixed with mortal inferiority; Laughter is a show of dominance, and expression of frustration over our mortality.
-Charles Baudelaire
Cruel Comedy

Arise from a dark and skeptical place; therefore, too dark and skeptical.
Incongruity
-“sudden frustrated expectation (Kant)”
-"the inappropriate within the appropriate."
-a twist, a surprise
-Kant
- Kierkegaard
-Aristotle (Rhetoric (III, 2)
-Henri Bergson
 "...Not, "jokes.

Can confuse object of humor with response
Relief
“outwitting” our natural impulses (Freud)
-tension à relief
-saving energy; joking allows the release of energy used to suppress a desire
-Freud
-Herbert Spencer
Awkward comedies: Meet the Parents; Zack Galafanakis.

-the most tense people are least receptive to humor
Play
Humor needs no justification; beauty is its own justification
-Schaeffer
-Rookmaaker


Can devolve into frivolity.
Evolutionary 
Laughter is unique to humans in evolutionary cycle.
-Max Eastman (evolutionary): man is like animal


Too dependent on a an evolutionary model.
Incomprehensible
"Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but the thing dies in the process and the innards are discouraging to any but the pure scientific mind (White)."
E.B. White


 Yes, humor, like all grand concepts, is mysterious. Yet, even if we cannot understand everything, we can understand SOME things.
Surprise
The essence of Comedy is the shock factor.
-Descartes


Explains a common feature of humor, but doesn't work as a comprehensive explanation. Errs is saying humor is "only" surprise.



Comedy and Tragedy (Chart)


Comedy
Tragedy
Happy-Ending: U shaped story
Sad-Ending: upside down U shaped story
Hero: Adapts, Improvises, Overcomes
Tragic-Hero: Rigid individualism; will only accept life on “own” terms
Salvation
Damnation
Freedom
Fate
Independence
Slavery
Redemption
Guilt
Adaption and Softening
Conflict, and Hardening (Pharaoh, Macbeth)
Forgiveness
Justice
Heaven
Hell
Repentance and Change: “Grace Eventually”
Unrepentance and Stagnation: “Grace Uneventfully”
Humility
Pride
Chaos to Order
Order to Chaos
Resurrection: Death to Life
Decomposition: Life to Death
Light
Heavy
Found
Lost
Affects (act on) leading to Effects (result): Production
Defects leading to : Futility
Realism
Idealism, Schaeffer, “Idealism is cruel… if you expect perfection or nothing – you get nothing.”
Ends with Wedding
Ends with Funeral
Resolution: Loose Ends Tied Up
Dissolution
Ends with Community
Ends with Isolation
Ultimately Rational: Riddle Resolved
Ultimately Irrational, “senseless crime” : Riddle Unresolved
We
Me
Acceptance of Reality (Credit to Stanley Cavell)
Avoidance of Reality: Crushed by Reality
Love
Hate
Moral
Moralistic
Freedom
Legalism
Reunion/Union
Separation/Alienation
Falling to Rising
Rising to Falling
Humility
Humiliation
Sanctification and Maturation
-change is possible for SELF and circumstances; ex. kid gets out of ghetto; poor kid “makes it”
Degeneration/Character Stagnation (persevere in bad faults to ruddy end)/ and finally become a caricature of themselves.
Big Picture: Transcendence
Small Picture: Immanence
Permanence/Durability
Impermanence
Average People: “Ordinary People”
Nobles
Perlocution: Joy, Happiness, Satisfaction, Hope, Laughter
Perlocution: Dejection, Sorrow, Bewilderment, Despair, Tears
Empathy
Sympathy: Pity for Tragic Hero (Oedipus)
Moment of Clarity before Resolution
Anagnorisis ("tragic recognition or insight") before final fall
Forgiveness
Revenge
Utility (Eccl. not about futility, but frustration)
Futility
Productive/Production
Destructive/Destruction
Eternal
Temporal (fleeting, brief): light and momentary trials; one thing that gives us HOPE is to know that all tragedy is in the CONTEXT of comedy; we have to interpret tragedy as BRIEF, non-enduring to be able to endure it well. It is not THE BIG picture, but a small part of the BIG picture.

 created by CWK

The Humor of John Calvin

by CWK


No one has more bad press as a grim theologian than John Calvin. 


However, when we turn to the actual man, he said things like this, commenting on John 14.12, “All that (Jesus) had hitherto told his disciples about himself, so far as it regarded them, was temporal; and therefore, if he had not added this clause, the consolation would not have been complete; particularly since our memory is so short, when we are called to consider the gifts of God. On this subject it is unnecessary to go to others for examples; for, when God has loaded us with every kind of blessings, if he pause for fourteen days, we fancy that he is no longer alive.” 


And this,


Bishops who think they imitate Christ by breathing on their ordinands are not "like actors whose gestures have some art and meaning," he jeered, "but like apes, which imitate everything wantonly and without any discrimination" (Institutes 4.19.29).

Christianity and The Comic Vision

Christianity and The Comic Vision
CWK





You must follow me carefully. I shall have to controvert one or two ideas that are almost universally accepted. The geometry, for instance, they taught you at school is founded on a misconception.
                                                                                                            — The Time Machine

           The comic vision is not just incidental to a Christian worldview, and the Christian scriptures. The comic worldview is Christian.
            Hopefulness – the prospect of some future good, with expectation of that good – this pervades 2 Kings 6.24ff, even in the midst of God’s judgment. The word of the Lord is, after all, sure (7.16-20).
            This note of hopefulness is shot throughout the Christian worldview – even in a time of famine and siege, and even when the Almighty seems to have turned against us.

Job even speaks of the Almighty as his enemy, but he never doubts, at the back of his mind, that his enemy has some kind of a case which he does not understand. In a fine and famous blasphemy he says, "Oh, that mine adversary had written a book!" (31:35). It never really occurs to him that it could possibly be a bad book. He is anxious to be convinced, that is, he thinks that God could convince him. In short, we may say again that if the word optimist means anything (which I doubt), Job is an optimist. He shakes the pillars of the world and strikes insanely at the heavens; he lashes the stars, but it is not to silence them; it is to make them speak.[1]

            The biblical Christian worldview is comedic. It is, actually, the only consistently comedic worldview that man has ever known. Despite this fact, or maybe because of it, critics still assail Christianity as a dark and gloomy enterprise. They blame Christianity for a lack of humor in the world, and cast the Lord Jesus as a, “pale Galilean.”
            Against such critics I only have facts to offer.
            To what will you compare Christianity as a greater source of genuine comedy and laughter? Paganism, which preceded it, was an exhausting display of fatalistic dreariness. If you were a pagan, you lived under the constant dread of the fates, and an Oedipus like gloom. Paganism fell down weeping at the feet of Jesus.[2]
            It would be possible to defend the comedic Christian worldview based only on the contribution of Christianity to the world. The Christians have written both the greatest tragedies and the greatest comedies. Dante’s Divine Comedy is divine. Shakespeare’s comedies have been enjoyed worldwide, and will continue to be, until – and in –  the eschaton. Jane Austen’s wit is matchless. The greatest parody, Don Quixote, was also written by a Christian, and “the prince of wit,” Cervantes.  And what of Edmund Spencer, Samuel Johnson, Christopher Marlowe, Pascal, George MacDonald, Daniel Defoe, Jonathon Swift, Lewis Carroll,  Mark Twain,[3] GK Chesterton, and Charles Schultz  -- what would the world be like without the unique comedic timing which each of these men contributed?
            However, the best way to defend the comedic Christian vision is to state that vision. Christianity is comedic in that it has a hope-filled stance toward reality. The universe is here by the whim of its benevolent creator. Man fell into tragedy, but that same creator, out of love, moved to change the arch of the story from tragedy to comedy. He dispatched his only son to bring redemption, and ultimately the happiest of happy endings: the new heavens and new earth wherein dwells righteousness. When it comes to a comedic vision two things are needed: redemption and a ‘happy ending.’ Christianity not only has that vision, it gave the world that vision.
            It will not do, as some have said, to say that Christianity is gloomy because of the cross. Yes, the cross is the moment of ultimate tragedy, but this tragedy only compliments and heightens the sheer comedic revelry of the larger story.  We cannot enjoy comedy without a corresponding sense of tragedy. The one enriches the other. The fact that Christianity preaches the greatest tragedy – the crucifixion of the innocent son of God – does not lessen, but actually increases, its comedic vision. This is especially so when we consider that the crucifixion was not mere tragedy. It was tragedy moving toward comedy. Jesus’ death was redemptive. It accomplished a joyful end, “to save his people from their sins.” Far from being pure tragedy, the cross demonstrates God’s redeeming power:

God's redeeming power that evokes laughter from believers is seen most powerfully in the "folly" of the redemptive work of Christ (1 Cor. 1-2): the glorious Creator becoming a baby and growing up to be a carpenter; the Creator of beauty becoming one who had nothing in his appearance to attract us to him; the source of all joy becoming the Man of Sorrows; this cursed and crucified Holy One, sustaining the universe as he makes his triumphal entry on a donkey, and who will one day return as a wrathful lamb. His life conjures images of Don Quixote chasing windmills and dreaming the impossible dream, except that Jesus does not die at the end—well, he does, but he is resurrected again—and all our hopes and dreams come true in him.[4] 

            Furthermore, the Christian narrative doesn’t end with the crucifixion of our Lord. After the cross comes resurrection, and then consummation. To read some writers, you’d think the gospels, and Christianity as a whole, end at the cross.
            A further word is needed on biblical Christianity. By that, I mean the truest expression of Christianity, i.e. the reformed faith. J. Gresham Machen was correct to say, “consistent Christianity is the easiest Christianity to defend, and that consistent Christianity – the only thoroughly Biblical Christianity – is found in the Reformed Faith.”[5]
            Christianity, the only true source of lasting comedy, has been critiqued for lacking comedy, but reformed Christianity has been especially critiqued.
            This is the impression in people’s minds, but once again, when we check the facts, and actually look into the details, we find the impression is all wrong.
            Historically, the reformed faith has been a boon to the comedic vision of a culture. The reformation traces its roots back to the scriptures. Shakespeare wrote in Elizabethan England some 60 years after the reformation. He was born the year John Calvin died. It has been argued, rightly, that the reformation unleashed a flood of creativity on the world that has not been seen since. The great historical preachers with a notable sense of “humor” are almost all connected to the reformed faith: Augustine, Martin Luther, John Calvin,[6] George Whitfield, Rowland Hill, Charles Spurgeon, A.W. Pink, John G. Patton, and in our day, Tim Keller. The puritans, again contrary to popular opinion, also serve as a rich suppository of wit, satire, humor, and hope.[7]
            In addition, Reformed Christianity, rightly held, highlights the following elements of a genuinely comic worldview:

1) Free-ness of God: Comedy is characterized by freedom. No one is more free than God.
2) Against Legalism: Harsh rules stifle human life and laughter.
3) Providence of God: Knowing God is sovereign enables us to relax, and enjoy.
4) New Heavens and New Earth: The earth will also be redeemed. Humor will be redeemed.
5) Salvation by Grace: Being loved and accepted freely enables us to be genuine, and laugh.
6) Free, undeserved mercy: This leads to humility—nothing humbles like reformed theology. The comedic perspective requires humility.

            So, when critics say the Bible is humorless –  what they mean is that it doesn’t have their kind of humor: the frivolous and irreverent humor of the world. This kind of criticism can only come from a worldly person who does accept a priori of the Bible’s view of life. If by humor we mean holy wit, thoughtful and sanctified word play – then the scriptures are full of it. The humor of the Bible  is not the lowbrow, quick, debasing variety. This humor is of a higher, and more thoughtful kind. Thus, in 2 Kings 6.24ff we find humor, but it requires thoughtfulness. It requires us to put the pieces together. The humor of the Bible is, in short, the kind that makes men smarter.


[1] G.K. Chesteron, Introduction to the Book of Job, available in ebook: http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~mward/gkc/books/job.html
[2] For a full discussion on Christianity as the ‘joyful’ savior of pale paganism see, Chesterton’s Orthodoxy.
[3] I realize that many would not count Twain among the Christians, but the fairest reading of him is a disillusioned Christian. In his autobiography he speaks of Christianity as “our religion.”
[4] Erik Thoennes, Laughing through Tears: The Redemptive Role of Humor in a Fallen World (Presbyterion 2007, Vol. 33.2) 81.
[5] David B. Calhoun, Princeton Seminary: Volume 2: The Majestic Testimony, 1869-1929 (Edinburgh: The Banner or Truth Trust, 1996), 226.
[6] No one has more bad press as a grim theologian than John Calvin. However, when we turn to the actual man, he said things like this, commenting on John 14.12, “All that (Jesus) had hitherto told his disciples about himself, so far as it regarded them, was temporal; and therefore, if he had not added this clause, the consolation would not have been complete; particularly since our memory is so short, when we are called to consider the gifts of God. On this subject it is unnecessary to go to others for examples; for, when God has loaded us with every kind of blessings, if he pause for fourteen days, we fancy that he is no longer alive.” Bishops who think they imitate Christ by breathing on their ordinands are not "like actors whose gestures have some art and meaning," he jeered, "but like apes, which imitate everything wantonly and without any discrimination" (Institutes 4.19.29).
[7] See Leland Ryken’s Worldly Saints.